| Draft domestic relations order submitted | Payee only | Notarized letter requesting removal and naming the affected plan | Yes — payee letter must be notarized | Yes — only in this draft-order scenario | Court Order Center Benefit Restrictions page |
|---|
| Domestic relations order becomes qualified | Court Order Center / plan process after qualification | Qualified domestic relations order / qualification determination | Not a letter path | No — restriction ends because the order becomes qualified, not because of a letter | Court Order Center Benefit Restrictions page |
|---|
| Payee later waives rights, or participant is entitled to 100% | Parties through the court | Subsequent court-certified order stating the waiver or 100% entitlement | Letter alone is not the remedy | No — need the subsequent court-certified order | Court Order Center Benefit Restrictions page |
|---|
| Prior order that caused the freeze is canceled | Parties through the court | Subsequent court-certified order canceling the order that caused the restriction | Letter alone is not the remedy | No — need the subsequent canceling court-certified order | Court Order Center Benefit Restrictions page |
|---|
| Order determined not qualifying (early release from freeze) | Participant and payee (or court) | Signed and notarized letters from both parties stating the freeze can be removed, or a subsequent court-certified qualifying or canceling order | Yes — both letters must be notarized if using the dual-letter path | Only the dual-letter (or court-order) path described in the booklet — not a single payee draft-order letter | TSP-BK-11 (distinct from Court Order Center draft-letter bullets) |
|---|
| Approved or qualified order still in force | Parties through the court | Subsequent court-certified waiver, entitlement, or canceling order as applicable | Letter alone does not clear the freeze | No — do not treat a notarized letter as removal of an approved/qualified order | Court Order Center Benefit Restrictions page |
|---|